The anti-fabrication scribe
It never invents a finding.
Every other scribe fills the gaps by guessing. Owl flags what it didn't hear and refuses to invent — in the SOAP note and in the narrative.
14 days free · cancel anytime
BCS noted — flagged: low confidence in the audio
The problem
A confident guess is the dangerous kind.
AI scribes hallucinate — they invent "normal" findings to make a note look complete, describing things that were never examined or said. In a medical record that isn't a quirk; it's a liability with your name on it.
It's also why "99% accurate" doesn't earn a vet's trust: the 1% is invisible. A fabricated line reads exactly like a real one, so you can't catch what you can't see. The only honest fix is a scribe that won't make things up in the first place.
How Owl is different
Null-and-flag, not fill-the-gap.
Missing data is flagged, not filled
If Owl didn't hear it, the field stays blank and gets flagged for your review — never auto-completed with a normal-looking finding.
It covers the narrative too
Anti-fabrication isn't just blank fields. Owl won't infer a diagnosis, a cause, or a detail you didn't state, even when the prose would read more smoothly with one.
Deterministic guards, not just a prompt
Owl's honesty is enforced in code that checks the note against what was actually said — not a polite request to the model that a clever phrasing can slip past.
Why it compounds trust
Every line is checkable — and it sees what you see.
When you keep the recording, you can replay the audio and check any line in the note against its source — Owl keeps it by default, and you stay in control. Honesty you can verify is the whole point — read how we handle your records on the Trust & security page.
And the truth isn't only in the audio. So much of an exam is visual, so Owl documents the photos you take alongside what you said — see Captures what you see.
FAQ
Hallucinations, answered.
Do AI scribes hallucinate?
Yes — most AI scribes fill gaps by guessing, which means they can describe findings that were never examined or said. That's the core risk the category doesn't talk about.
How does Owl avoid it?
Owl uses null-and-flag: if it didn't hear something, it leaves the field blank and flags it for your review instead of inventing a value. The rule is enforced in deterministic code, and it covers the narrative, not just empty fields.
What happens when Owl doesn't hear something?
It flags the gap in the note so you can fill it in — you're completing a note, not hunting for fabrications. Nothing is invented to paper over the silence.
Is it accurate?
We answer accuracy with mechanism, not a percentage. Owl writes only what it heard or saw and flags the rest — and when you keep the recording (kept by default, your choice), you can verify any line against the source. A number you can't audit isn't trust; a checkable note is.
Try the scribe that won't make things up.
Capture your first visit in the next five minutes and see the flags for yourself.
Start free$149/mo for a solo vet, or $1,490/yr — two months free.